Don't Be a Lonely Cloud

Michael Archambault
July 25, 2024 | 4 min read

The romantic mythology of the hermit is deep within every creative individual. As a writer, the notion is particularly enticing — disappear from view, only to emerge months later with the next once-in-a-generation novel.

But, contrary to popular belief, the legend of the brilliant hermit is likely just that — a legend, an ideal, an archetype, a dream.

Many prolific writers thought to embody the romantic recluse, like William Wordsworth, Henry David Thoreau, and Emily Dickinson, actually defy the stereotype.

A closer study reveals that we, as writers, must live fully present in the world.

These Are Not The Hermits You're Looking For

Take popular poet William Wordsworth. His poetry is full of beautiful odes to the natural world and the thoughts that come to us in solitude. From his poem, "I Wandered Lonely as a Cloud":

I wandered lonely as a cloud
That floats on high o'er vales and hills,
When all at once I saw a crowd,
A host, of golden daffodils;
Beside the lake, beneath the trees,
Fluttering and dancing in the breeze.
...
For oft, when on my couch I lie
In vacant or in pensive mood,
They flash upon that inward eye
Which is the bliss of solitude;
And then my heart with pleasure fills,
And dances with the daffodils.

Despite the public’s perception of Wordsworth as a “hermit,” he actually had an active social life and maintained healthy relationships with other writers.

Additionally, he remained active in political and social issues at the time and frequently traveled — aspects of life that greatly impacted his work.

Another famous poet allegedly known for her hermit lifestyle was Emily Dickinson. But Dickinson, too, was active throughout her younger years, maintaining social engagements and continually upholding connections through letter writing.

In fact, it wasn't until Dickinson's later years that she became more reclusive due to mental health issues.

Even Henry David Thoreau only lived in his remote cabin on Walden Pond for two years! In Walden, he wrote:

“I am naturally no hermit, but might possibly sit out the sturdiest frequenter of the bar-room, if my business called me thither.”

To Write, You Must First Live

Not being a writer tucked away from the world isn't enough, though. Classic writers throughout history have attested to the need to get up and live, to experience the world, before sitting down to write about it.

Lost Generation novelist Ernest Hemingway once stated,

"In order to write about life, first you must live it."

Even Thoreau, one of the most famous examples of the writer-hermit archetype, proclaimed,

"How vain it is to sit down to write when you have not stood up to live."

And Mark Twain told us to:

"Write what you know."

Twain's travels and experiences profoundly impacted him and his writing; if he were a hermit, he likely never would have gained the knowledge needed to shape stories around the complex society surrounding him — life during the American Civil War and a rapid time of industrialization and urbanization in America.

Many of the greatest writers of the past few centuries, even those commonly thought of as glorious hermits, rejected the notion that solitude would suddenly lead to great work. At least not without first living.

The Romanticism of Solitude

If the greatest hermit-writers of classic literature were no such thing, why does the romanticism of the idea persist to this day?

The idea likely began during the Romantic era, the late 18th to mid-19th centuries, when certain writers revered individualism. While Wordsworth and Thoreau were indeed among this group, their emphasis on solitude is misunderstood.

Contrary to popular belief, the great poets did not advocate for writers to forsake their friends and family, their other hobbies, their jobs, their entire lives, in pursuit of solitude. Instead, Wordsworth and Thoreau sought to underscore the value of personal time and, indeed, the natural world, as a way to foster a deeper understanding of the world at large and invite inspiration.

Modern-day media has yet to help dispel the myth. Popular films such as Capote show the titular author's isolated lifestyle. Similarly, the novel Big Sur depicts novelist and poet Jack Kerouac relocating to a secluded cabin to work through his process. But, in truth, neither author completely removed themselves from society.

The notion of the lone genius is a legend, and trying to recreate that sort of lifestyle can actually hinder creativity — not to mention mental health.

 

Building Modern Solitude 

While nobody recommends fully withdrawing from society for the sake of writing your book, it’s definitely true that modern writers contend with distraction on a level unknown to Wordsworth and his contemporaries.

Modern technology is better than ever at stealing our attention and keeping it. This means that, in healthy doses, seclusion can benefit the modern writer. Simply removing distractions can help writers concentrate better on their work and allow more significant space to explore ideas.

The good news? You don’t need to move to a cabin in the forest. You just need a Freewrite.

As writers, it's common to feel guilty when we are not writing. It's a little like always having homework. But it's important to remember that even the greats made sure to live.

So don't cancel on your friends. Don't spend every waking moment with your eyes glued to the blank page. Don't sell everything and move to Paris to channel the souls of the Lost Generation.

Live your life.

Live your life, and write about it.

 

RETURN TO "HOW TO BE CONSISTENTLY CREATIVE"

Recommended articles

More recommended articles for you

September 05, 2024 7 min read

Everyone has a pandemic story because it's hard to forget. I remember the quickness of it all — societal norms flipping, turning, and somersaulting, which still makes my head spin. "Stuff is gonna get weird," I remember telling my friend. "Especially art."

August 29, 2024 4 min read

Right now, the choice for a writer to use artificial intelligence (AI) or not has been largely a personal one. Some view it as a killer of creativity, while others see it as an endless well of inspiration.

But what if, in the future, your choice had larger implications on the state of literature as a whole?

This is the question that’s being raised from a new study by the University of Exeter Business School: If you could use AI to improve your own writing, at the expense of the overall literary experience, would you?

Let’s explore some context before you answer.

The Set Up

The 2024 study recruited 293 writers to write an eight-sentence “micro” story. The participants were split into three groups:

  • Writing by human brainpower only
  • The opportunity to get one AI-generated idea to inspire their writing
  • The opportunity to get up to five AI-generated ideas to inspire their writing

Then, 600 evaluators judged how creative these short stories were. The results confirmed a widely accepted idea but also offered a few surprising findings.

Prompts from AI Can Jumpstart the Creative Process

Right off the bat, the reviewers rated the AI-guided stories as being more original, better written, and more enjoyable to read. (Interesting to note that they did not find them funnier than the fully human-inspired stories.)

This actually isn’t that surprising. Most writers know the “blank page dread” at the beginning of a project. Even as I write this, I can’t help but wonder, “If I had been tasked with writing an eight-sentence story, what the heck would I have written about?”

Many writers share this sense of needing to pick the “right” story to tell. And that uniquely human concept of perfectionism can end up actually inhibiting our creative process.

A prompt, then, can help us quickly clear this mental hurdle. To test this, I’ll give you one, courtesy of ChatGPT: “Write a story about a teenager who discovers a mysterious journal that reveals hidden secrets about their town, leading them on an unexpected adventure to uncover the truth.”

Can you feel your creative juices flowing already?

Since its release, AI has been celebrated for its ability to assist in idea generation; and this study confirms how effective using artificial intelligence in this way can be for writers — some, it seems, more than others.

AI-Generated Ideas Helped Less Creative Writers More

It doesn’t feel great to judge a writer’s creative prowess, but for this study, researchers needed to do just that. Prior to writing their short stories, the writers took a test to measure their creativity.

Researchers found that those considered less creative did substantially better when given AI-generated ideas — to the point where getting the full five ideas from AI “effectively equalizes the creativity scores across less and more creative writers.”

This isn’t the case just for writing. Another study by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship WZ also found that AI tools most benefit employees with weaker skills.

So is AI leveling the playing field between okay and great writers? It seems it may be. But before we lament, there’s one more finding that proves using AI isn’t all perks.

AI-Aided Stories Were More Similar — And Needed to Be Credited

The researchers took a step back to look at all the AI-supported stories collectively. And what did they find?

The AI-assisted stories were more similar as a whole, compared to the fully human-written stories.

Additionally, when reviewers were told that a story was enhanced by an AI idea, they “imposed an ownership penalty of at least 25%,” even indicating that “the content creators, on which the models were based, should be compensated.”

This leads us to that all-important question about AI-assisted work: who owns the content?

According to Originality.AI, an AI and plagiarism detector, “When there’s a combination of AI and human-generated elements, the human elements may receive copyright protection if they meet the requirements.”

So right now, if a writer uses AI to generate ideas — but writes the content themselves — they retain rights to the work.

However, Originality.AI even admits that “the legal system is having a hard time keeping up” with the rapid adoption of artificial intelligence. Time will only tell what AI regulations will look like in a few years.

What Does an AI-Assisted Literary Future Look Like?

The researchers from the University of Exeter Business School study raise an interesting point about what the future landscape for writers may look like. If droves of authors begin using AI to come up with ideas, we may end up with a lot of well-written yet dime-a-dozen stories.

So will human beings choose the easier, but less diverse, path? Or will we stick to fighting through writer’s block armed with nothing but our own brain?

Or, a third option: can we somehow learn to harness AI to supercharge our writing process without sacrificing the wholly unique creativity that infuses human creation?

That’s one question that even ChatGPT can’t answer.

Editor's Note: Artificial intelligence may have already transformed writing, but that doesn't mean you shouldn't be in control of your own words. Read Astrohaus Founder Adam Leeb's statement on AI and privacy.

August 22, 2024 8 min read

While AI has capabilities that range from coding to image generation, the model that excites — and terrifies — writers is the LLM. It won’t be long before we see the world’s first blockbuster novel, written entirely by an LLM. What does this mean for art, and writers in particular? Is it all doom and gloom? The answer is, of course, more complicated than yes or no.