Writing Sprints 101

Bryan Young
June 12, 2024 | 3 min read

So much of writing is managing your time. Deadlines come and go, but the words aren’t going to write themselves. Learning to manage your time will save you a lot of grief.

But what about when the words just won't flow?

You still have to write. And writing sprints are a great motivator for many to get through some of those tough periods.

It turns out a little competition — with others or yourself — can really push you through to the finish line.

Community Sprints

Writing sprints as a social activity were first introduced to me while participating in NaNoWriMo's November challenge for National Novel Writing Month.

NaNo's "municipal liaisons" in each region would host get-togethers and write-ins to provide a little bit of structure and accountability for those writers who wanted it. At a write-in like these, the leader would set a timer (usually for anywhere from 5-30 minutes), and whoever wrote the most words in that amount of time won the sprint.

The best group writing sprint I’ve been a part of actually took place at a chocolatier’s shop. The winning writer with the highest word count was rewarded with an artisan chocolate. Talk about incentive!

There are also online communities that host sprints, including the Freewrite Fam! Sign up to our email list to be notified when we're hosting a sprint.

Sometimes, all you need to focus is that little bit of competition.

 

Solo Sprints

Writing isn’t always so social, and our world is very full of distractions whether you're with friends or writing alone. I know when I’m sitting by myself in my office, writing anything from articles like this to working on my new book, it’s easy to get distracted by social media and research and kids — and anything else that might just snag my focus.

What I do in those instances is pull out my Freewrite and utilize the Pomodoro Technique.

This is a popular focus technique invented in the late 1980s by university student Francesco Cirillo who found himself overwhelmed by his studies.

Cirillo used a tomato-shaped kitchen timer ("tomato" is pomodoro in Italian) to give himself twenty-five minutes to focus on an overwhelming task and then allowed himself a five-minute break. After the break, he repeated the procss. After three or four of these cycles, he would take a longer thirty-minute break.

It turns out this type of method works wonders for me — and lots of other writers. For myself, I much prefer five minutes of focus and one minute of rest and then a ten minute break after five of those cycles. I have a Time Timer on my desk for when I’m on my computer, but I don’t need it when I’m using my Smart Typewriter or Traveler.

The Freewrite and Traveler both have a special secondary screen. Usually, I have that screen set to show me my word count, but when I need extra focus, I can switch it to a timer. Then, it’s able to show me how long I’ve been writing, and I can keep track of my focused Pomodoro sessions without even having to look away from my keyboard. It’s just one more thing that makes the Freewrite an invaluable focus tool for me to accomplish my writing goals.

Pressuring myself with a timer to get a small amount of words done works wonders for my productivity — it relieves the pressure and makes the task of writing seem more manageable.

And if I lose focus for one Pomodoro sprint, it's OK. Because there's another one coming right up. That small bit of structure is enough to get me moving forward and writing with ease.

Return to “Writing Productivity Hacks"

Recommended articles

More recommended articles for you

September 05, 2024 7 min read

Everyone has a pandemic story because it's hard to forget. I remember the quickness of it all — societal norms flipping, turning, and somersaulting, which still makes my head spin. "Stuff is gonna get weird," I remember telling my friend. "Especially art."

August 29, 2024 4 min read

Right now, the choice for a writer to use artificial intelligence (AI) or not has been largely a personal one. Some view it as a killer of creativity, while others see it as an endless well of inspiration.

But what if, in the future, your choice had larger implications on the state of literature as a whole?

This is the question that’s being raised from a new study by the University of Exeter Business School: If you could use AI to improve your own writing, at the expense of the overall literary experience, would you?

Let’s explore some context before you answer.

The Set Up

The 2024 study recruited 293 writers to write an eight-sentence “micro” story. The participants were split into three groups:

  • Writing by human brainpower only
  • The opportunity to get one AI-generated idea to inspire their writing
  • The opportunity to get up to five AI-generated ideas to inspire their writing

Then, 600 evaluators judged how creative these short stories were. The results confirmed a widely accepted idea but also offered a few surprising findings.

Prompts from AI Can Jumpstart the Creative Process

Right off the bat, the reviewers rated the AI-guided stories as being more original, better written, and more enjoyable to read. (Interesting to note that they did not find them funnier than the fully human-inspired stories.)

This actually isn’t that surprising. Most writers know the “blank page dread” at the beginning of a project. Even as I write this, I can’t help but wonder, “If I had been tasked with writing an eight-sentence story, what the heck would I have written about?”

Many writers share this sense of needing to pick the “right” story to tell. And that uniquely human concept of perfectionism can end up actually inhibiting our creative process.

A prompt, then, can help us quickly clear this mental hurdle. To test this, I’ll give you one, courtesy of ChatGPT: “Write a story about a teenager who discovers a mysterious journal that reveals hidden secrets about their town, leading them on an unexpected adventure to uncover the truth.”

Can you feel your creative juices flowing already?

Since its release, AI has been celebrated for its ability to assist in idea generation; and this study confirms how effective using artificial intelligence in this way can be for writers — some, it seems, more than others.

AI-Generated Ideas Helped Less Creative Writers More

It doesn’t feel great to judge a writer’s creative prowess, but for this study, researchers needed to do just that. Prior to writing their short stories, the writers took a test to measure their creativity.

Researchers found that those considered less creative did substantially better when given AI-generated ideas — to the point where getting the full five ideas from AI “effectively equalizes the creativity scores across less and more creative writers.”

This isn’t the case just for writing. Another study by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship WZ also found that AI tools most benefit employees with weaker skills.

So is AI leveling the playing field between okay and great writers? It seems it may be. But before we lament, there’s one more finding that proves using AI isn’t all perks.

AI-Aided Stories Were More Similar — And Needed to Be Credited

The researchers took a step back to look at all the AI-supported stories collectively. And what did they find?

The AI-assisted stories were more similar as a whole, compared to the fully human-written stories.

Additionally, when reviewers were told that a story was enhanced by an AI idea, they “imposed an ownership penalty of at least 25%,” even indicating that “the content creators, on which the models were based, should be compensated.”

This leads us to that all-important question about AI-assisted work: who owns the content?

According to Originality.AI, an AI and plagiarism detector, “When there’s a combination of AI and human-generated elements, the human elements may receive copyright protection if they meet the requirements.”

So right now, if a writer uses AI to generate ideas — but writes the content themselves — they retain rights to the work.

However, Originality.AI even admits that “the legal system is having a hard time keeping up” with the rapid adoption of artificial intelligence. Time will only tell what AI regulations will look like in a few years.

What Does an AI-Assisted Literary Future Look Like?

The researchers from the University of Exeter Business School study raise an interesting point about what the future landscape for writers may look like. If droves of authors begin using AI to come up with ideas, we may end up with a lot of well-written yet dime-a-dozen stories.

So will human beings choose the easier, but less diverse, path? Or will we stick to fighting through writer’s block armed with nothing but our own brain?

Or, a third option: can we somehow learn to harness AI to supercharge our writing process without sacrificing the wholly unique creativity that infuses human creation?

That’s one question that even ChatGPT can’t answer.

Editor's Note: Artificial intelligence may have already transformed writing, but that doesn't mean you shouldn't be in control of your own words. Read Astrohaus Founder Adam Leeb's statement on AI and privacy.

August 22, 2024 8 min read

While AI has capabilities that range from coding to image generation, the model that excites — and terrifies — writers is the LLM. It won’t be long before we see the world’s first blockbuster novel, written entirely by an LLM. What does this mean for art, and writers in particular? Is it all doom and gloom? The answer is, of course, more complicated than yes or no.