How Focus Affects Creativity

Concetta Cucchiarelli
July 05, 2024 | 4 min read

When we think about creativity, we often envision a burst of fantastic ideas or artistic endeavors.

However, creativity is more of an approach to problem-solving and innovation that is applicable in all areas of life.

What exactly is creativity?

As Dictionary.com defines it, creativity is “the ability to transcend traditional ideas, rules, patterns, relationships, or the like, and to create meaningful new ideas, forms, methods, interpretations, etc.”

Despite its incredible value, the psychological underpinnings of creativity remain mysterious. But one thing we know for sure is that it's spontaneous and difficult to produce on demand.

Creativity on Demand

This elusiveness poses a challenge, especially nowadays, when creativity is often expected on a schedule. Unfortunately, while there are activities to foster creativity, there isn't a definitive recipe.

However, we can make creativity more manageable by viewing it as a process rather than a skill.

We can make creativity more manageable by viewing it as a process rather than a skill.

In his book Building a Second Brain, Tiago Forte explains that while creative products change over time, the creative process remains constant and involves two phases: divergent and convergent.

In the divergent phase, we need to stay open-minded and generate as many ideas as possible.

In the convergent phase, we narrow down, select, and execute ideas. This phase is necessary to transform ideas into actual products or solutions.

Neurologically, the best state for creating ideas and solutions is the “daydreaming” or “mind-wandering” mode, the state of the brain at rest, which is defined as the “default mode network” by Marcus Raichle. In this state, the brain, disengaged from intentional focus, creates new neural connections and associations and expands concepts.

On the other hand, during the convergent phase, when we select ideas to act upon, our brain utilizes “stay-on-task" mode (or intentional focus, as discussed in our previous article) to help you execute a task without distractions.

(Learn how focus works psychologically.)

These modes are mutually exclusive; in other words, one suppresses the other.

Neurologically, the best state for creating ideas and solutions is the “daydreaming” or “mind-wandering” mode, the state of the brain at rest ... On the other hand, when we select ideas to act upon, our brain utilizes “stay-on-task mode."

As you may have experienced for yourself, mind-wandering mode is crucial for creativity, and it happens almost unpredictably, and only when we are free from our to-do lists. That's why, in today’s busy world, it's important to intentionally schedule this mind-wandering, or creative time.

That might seem counterintuitive, but in today’s world of distractions, you must purposely release yourself from your never-ending to-do list in order to let your mind wander.

What does this look like? Going out for a walk or engaging in boring or repetitive (and not mentally demanding) activities, like cleaning or gardening, can increase the chances of activating this mode. Or sitting in front of your Freewrite and letting thoughts flow through your fingers!

In today’s busy world, it's important to intentionally schedule this mind-wandering, or creative time.

Why You See the Yellow Cars

Both phases of the creative process involve a high level of focus — yes, even the divergent phase.

But how is it possible to focus (which we know consists of filtering out information to stay on task), and also stay open to possibilities simultaneously?

We’re able to do it because of selective attention, the process that makes us notice all the many yellow cars on the street once we decide we want to buy a yellow car. When we tell our brain that yellow cars are important or relevant, it pays more attention to them, working as a guide for our mind-wandering.

So, if we want to improve our creative process and get actual results, we should apply and practice focusing at two different levels.

Two Types of Focus

First, focus on just one project to guide your brain's wandering to get the answers and clues you are looking for, to let your brain make connections and come up with new ideas. Even when you’re just generating ideas, it's an excellent habit to focus on "The One Thing," as Gary Keller and Jay Papasan define it in their book.

Next, focus on a single task to accomplish it. When Albert Einstein disappeared from the public eye for three years, for example, he decided to focus on one single research project. This allowed him to create his groundbreaking theory of relativity.

While these types of focus differ cognitively, both are essential compasses for our thinking, and both involve narrowing your goals. It's why many highly creative individuals are often believed to be obsessed with one thing.

It's why many highly creative individuals are often believed to be obsessed with one thing.

You don't need to become obsessed. But if you provide clear directions to your brain through the proper focus, creativity will flow.

--

Next, learn how to choose the more difficult task of creating (writing, painting, etc) over consuming (endlessly scrolling) every time

 

Return to “The Psychology of Focus”

Recommended articles

More recommended articles for you

September 05, 2024 7 min read

Everyone has a pandemic story because it's hard to forget. I remember the quickness of it all — societal norms flipping, turning, and somersaulting, which still makes my head spin. "Stuff is gonna get weird," I remember telling my friend. "Especially art."

August 29, 2024 4 min read

Right now, the choice for a writer to use artificial intelligence (AI) or not has been largely a personal one. Some view it as a killer of creativity, while others see it as an endless well of inspiration.

But what if, in the future, your choice had larger implications on the state of literature as a whole?

This is the question that’s being raised from a new study by the University of Exeter Business School: If you could use AI to improve your own writing, at the expense of the overall literary experience, would you?

Let’s explore some context before you answer.

The Set Up

The 2024 study recruited 293 writers to write an eight-sentence “micro” story. The participants were split into three groups:

  • Writing by human brainpower only
  • The opportunity to get one AI-generated idea to inspire their writing
  • The opportunity to get up to five AI-generated ideas to inspire their writing

Then, 600 evaluators judged how creative these short stories were. The results confirmed a widely accepted idea but also offered a few surprising findings.

Prompts from AI Can Jumpstart the Creative Process

Right off the bat, the reviewers rated the AI-guided stories as being more original, better written, and more enjoyable to read. (Interesting to note that they did not find them funnier than the fully human-inspired stories.)

This actually isn’t that surprising. Most writers know the “blank page dread” at the beginning of a project. Even as I write this, I can’t help but wonder, “If I had been tasked with writing an eight-sentence story, what the heck would I have written about?”

Many writers share this sense of needing to pick the “right” story to tell. And that uniquely human concept of perfectionism can end up actually inhibiting our creative process.

A prompt, then, can help us quickly clear this mental hurdle. To test this, I’ll give you one, courtesy of ChatGPT: “Write a story about a teenager who discovers a mysterious journal that reveals hidden secrets about their town, leading them on an unexpected adventure to uncover the truth.”

Can you feel your creative juices flowing already?

Since its release, AI has been celebrated for its ability to assist in idea generation; and this study confirms how effective using artificial intelligence in this way can be for writers — some, it seems, more than others.

AI-Generated Ideas Helped Less Creative Writers More

It doesn’t feel great to judge a writer’s creative prowess, but for this study, researchers needed to do just that. Prior to writing their short stories, the writers took a test to measure their creativity.

Researchers found that those considered less creative did substantially better when given AI-generated ideas — to the point where getting the full five ideas from AI “effectively equalizes the creativity scores across less and more creative writers.”

This isn’t the case just for writing. Another study by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship WZ also found that AI tools most benefit employees with weaker skills.

So is AI leveling the playing field between okay and great writers? It seems it may be. But before we lament, there’s one more finding that proves using AI isn’t all perks.

AI-Aided Stories Were More Similar — And Needed to Be Credited

The researchers took a step back to look at all the AI-supported stories collectively. And what did they find?

The AI-assisted stories were more similar as a whole, compared to the fully human-written stories.

Additionally, when reviewers were told that a story was enhanced by an AI idea, they “imposed an ownership penalty of at least 25%,” even indicating that “the content creators, on which the models were based, should be compensated.”

This leads us to that all-important question about AI-assisted work: who owns the content?

According to Originality.AI, an AI and plagiarism detector, “When there’s a combination of AI and human-generated elements, the human elements may receive copyright protection if they meet the requirements.”

So right now, if a writer uses AI to generate ideas — but writes the content themselves — they retain rights to the work.

However, Originality.AI even admits that “the legal system is having a hard time keeping up” with the rapid adoption of artificial intelligence. Time will only tell what AI regulations will look like in a few years.

What Does an AI-Assisted Literary Future Look Like?

The researchers from the University of Exeter Business School study raise an interesting point about what the future landscape for writers may look like. If droves of authors begin using AI to come up with ideas, we may end up with a lot of well-written yet dime-a-dozen stories.

So will human beings choose the easier, but less diverse, path? Or will we stick to fighting through writer’s block armed with nothing but our own brain?

Or, a third option: can we somehow learn to harness AI to supercharge our writing process without sacrificing the wholly unique creativity that infuses human creation?

That’s one question that even ChatGPT can’t answer.

Editor's Note: Artificial intelligence may have already transformed writing, but that doesn't mean you shouldn't be in control of your own words. Read Astrohaus Founder Adam Leeb's statement on AI and privacy.

August 22, 2024 8 min read

While AI has capabilities that range from coding to image generation, the model that excites — and terrifies — writers is the LLM. It won’t be long before we see the world’s first blockbuster novel, written entirely by an LLM. What does this mean for art, and writers in particular? Is it all doom and gloom? The answer is, of course, more complicated than yes or no.