Pixels & Ink: Writing for the Screen vs. Writing for the Page

Annie Cosby
May 08, 2024 | 4 min read
While both films and books share the common goal of captivating an audience, their paths seem to diverge in intriguing ways, from the initial drafting all the way through to the public release.

So we set out to answer the question: Is there a difference in writing for the screen vs. writing for the page?

Welcome to the intersection of ink and celluloid. (Or pixels, in today's world.)

 

Jumping from Film to Prose

New Jersey native Bobby Miller began writing and directing films in the 5th grade and never stopped. His films, which are written on Freewrite, have premiered at Sundance, SXSW, and the like. His short Tub premiered at Sundance, and he followed that up with his first feature film, The Cleanse, starring Johnny Galecki and Anjelica Huston, which was released in theaters by Sony Pictures and made Rotten Tomatoes Top 10 Best-Reviewed Genre Films. 

But during the pandemic — when he became a dad — Bobby returned to his first love: prose fiction.

He started writing short stories, which were published in Expat Press, Maudlin House, and Bending Genres, and his "completely unhinged" debut novel attracted the interest of literary agent Dan Milaschewski at United Talent Agency.

So we thought he was the perfect person to settle the matter:

 

Is Writing for the Screen Different than Writing for the Page?

 

Bobby working with the cast on the set of The Cleanse

Bobby says his process for both is relatively similar. He creates an outline and then uses Freewrite Traveler to freewrite the first draft. Once he has a first draft, he exports it to his computer to revise.

But how does the actual craft writing of a screenplay stack up to writing a book?

Well, for one, there's the formatting. Screenplays require specific formatting, which is why Freewrite devices support the use of Fountain syntax. Additionally, film screenplays are often considerably shorter than a book.

The writing itself, however, is a little more nuanced.

"I was taught that the read should be 'invisible' in screenplays," Bobby says, "meaning it should be so spare and concise that you don't even realize you're reading something. As someone who directs his own writing, I would just think, 'Well, I'll figure that out visually later.' With a book, obviously, there is no figuring it out later. You have to paint a picture."

So, which does he prefer, writing books or movies?

"If I'm being honest, I found writing a book more freeing in terms of content in that I could write something that might be revealing or embarrassing in a book and not face an audience. Conversely, if I write something for a movie, I know I’ll have to mount it with actors and a crew and eventually face an audience. I'm unsure I can choose a favorite, but I'm more jazzed about fiction right now because I think I can be funnier, more honest, and subversive."

Regardless of the medium, Bobby's advice for anyone drafting a story is simple:

Move forward.

"Don’t edit, don’t try to get it perfect. Save that for the computer later." Bobby says that in his experience, if you keep moving forward, your brain surprises you, and you end up with stuff you didn’t intend to write when you sat down. And isn't that the point of writing?

"I really want that first draft to be free of overthinking. In today’s endless world of distractions, [freewriting has] become my happy, focused place."

 

The Book Was Better (Or Was It?)

And what about book-to-movie adaptations? It's quite the hot topic for writers, readers, and film buffs alike. What kind of work goes into moving a story from book to screen?

Bobby says adaptations need to function as a movie first and satisfy the themes and issues of the book second. "If you're a slave to the book, it just creates a limp film."

Bobby is most interested in writer/directors who take a book and make it their own.

"For example, in The Shining, I completely understand why Stephen King would be pissed with the Kubrick film. But also, no one is altering the book. Everyone can go back to the text. I see no harm in that."

Find out why other freewriting director-screenwriters agree.

 

Listen to the Director's Commentary

Crafting a screenplay requires a keen eye for visual storytelling and brevity, while penning a book demands intricate world-building.

As for Bobby, he continues to make his way in both the film and book worlds. The Cleanse was just released on special edition Blu-ray — "I've been hoping Sony would do this since they bought the film in 2018, and it's finally happening," Bobby says — and the commentary track includes a lot of writer talk. Bobby hopes the release will serve as a warts-and-all guide to making your first feature film.

Outside of film, Bobby has worked as a comedy writer/director for places like BuzzFeed, SuperDeluxe, MTV, SoulPancake, and Google, and is a winner of two Webby Awards. He has also done dialogue editing for the animated shows Big Mouth and Human Resourcesand works as a voice director for Rockstar Games.

On the book front, Bobby signed with an agent and is getting ready to publish his debut novel.

Check out Bobby's Substack at bobbymillertime.com or follow him on X or Instagram.

 

 

Recommended articles

More recommended articles for you

September 05, 2024 7 min read

Everyone has a pandemic story because it's hard to forget. I remember the quickness of it all — societal norms flipping, turning, and somersaulting, which still makes my head spin. "Stuff is gonna get weird," I remember telling my friend. "Especially art."

August 29, 2024 4 min read

Right now, the choice for a writer to use artificial intelligence (AI) or not has been largely a personal one. Some view it as a killer of creativity, while others see it as an endless well of inspiration.

But what if, in the future, your choice had larger implications on the state of literature as a whole?

This is the question that’s being raised from a new study by the University of Exeter Business School: If you could use AI to improve your own writing, at the expense of the overall literary experience, would you?

Let’s explore some context before you answer.

The Set Up

The 2024 study recruited 293 writers to write an eight-sentence “micro” story. The participants were split into three groups:

  • Writing by human brainpower only
  • The opportunity to get one AI-generated idea to inspire their writing
  • The opportunity to get up to five AI-generated ideas to inspire their writing

Then, 600 evaluators judged how creative these short stories were. The results confirmed a widely accepted idea but also offered a few surprising findings.

Prompts from AI Can Jumpstart the Creative Process

Right off the bat, the reviewers rated the AI-guided stories as being more original, better written, and more enjoyable to read. (Interesting to note that they did not find them funnier than the fully human-inspired stories.)

This actually isn’t that surprising. Most writers know the “blank page dread” at the beginning of a project. Even as I write this, I can’t help but wonder, “If I had been tasked with writing an eight-sentence story, what the heck would I have written about?”

Many writers share this sense of needing to pick the “right” story to tell. And that uniquely human concept of perfectionism can end up actually inhibiting our creative process.

A prompt, then, can help us quickly clear this mental hurdle. To test this, I’ll give you one, courtesy of ChatGPT: “Write a story about a teenager who discovers a mysterious journal that reveals hidden secrets about their town, leading them on an unexpected adventure to uncover the truth.”

Can you feel your creative juices flowing already?

Since its release, AI has been celebrated for its ability to assist in idea generation; and this study confirms how effective using artificial intelligence in this way can be for writers — some, it seems, more than others.

AI-Generated Ideas Helped Less Creative Writers More

It doesn’t feel great to judge a writer’s creative prowess, but for this study, researchers needed to do just that. Prior to writing their short stories, the writers took a test to measure their creativity.

Researchers found that those considered less creative did substantially better when given AI-generated ideas — to the point where getting the full five ideas from AI “effectively equalizes the creativity scores across less and more creative writers.”

This isn’t the case just for writing. Another study by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship WZ also found that AI tools most benefit employees with weaker skills.

So is AI leveling the playing field between okay and great writers? It seems it may be. But before we lament, there’s one more finding that proves using AI isn’t all perks.

AI-Aided Stories Were More Similar — And Needed to Be Credited

The researchers took a step back to look at all the AI-supported stories collectively. And what did they find?

The AI-assisted stories were more similar as a whole, compared to the fully human-written stories.

Additionally, when reviewers were told that a story was enhanced by an AI idea, they “imposed an ownership penalty of at least 25%,” even indicating that “the content creators, on which the models were based, should be compensated.”

This leads us to that all-important question about AI-assisted work: who owns the content?

According to Originality.AI, an AI and plagiarism detector, “When there’s a combination of AI and human-generated elements, the human elements may receive copyright protection if they meet the requirements.”

So right now, if a writer uses AI to generate ideas — but writes the content themselves — they retain rights to the work.

However, Originality.AI even admits that “the legal system is having a hard time keeping up” with the rapid adoption of artificial intelligence. Time will only tell what AI regulations will look like in a few years.

What Does an AI-Assisted Literary Future Look Like?

The researchers from the University of Exeter Business School study raise an interesting point about what the future landscape for writers may look like. If droves of authors begin using AI to come up with ideas, we may end up with a lot of well-written yet dime-a-dozen stories.

So will human beings choose the easier, but less diverse, path? Or will we stick to fighting through writer’s block armed with nothing but our own brain?

Or, a third option: can we somehow learn to harness AI to supercharge our writing process without sacrificing the wholly unique creativity that infuses human creation?

That’s one question that even ChatGPT can’t answer.

Editor's Note: Artificial intelligence may have already transformed writing, but that doesn't mean you shouldn't be in control of your own words. Read Astrohaus Founder Adam Leeb's statement on AI and privacy.

August 22, 2024 8 min read

While AI has capabilities that range from coding to image generation, the model that excites — and terrifies — writers is the LLM. It won’t be long before we see the world’s first blockbuster novel, written entirely by an LLM. What does this mean for art, and writers in particular? Is it all doom and gloom? The answer is, of course, more complicated than yes or no.