Is Your Smartphone Sabotaging Your Health?

Emily Pogue
August 07, 2024 | 7 min read

Today, it seems like every piece of technology needs to have at least two functions (more realistically, five) to be considered competitive.

We can check our text messages on a smart fridge. We can check our sleep score to see how well we slept without thinking about how we feel.

We can buy a toothbrush that sends updates to our phone detailing how effective our brushing has been.

It's convenient, sure. But has this access to everything — everything — all at once affected how our brains work?

The Dawn of Smart Devices

The first smart device was the IBM Simon Personal Communicator, released in August 1994. At eight inches long and weighing over a pound, Simon wasn’t exactly the epitome of sleek.

Yet, at the time, it was darn impressive, because it allowed its user access to many functions (not yet called “apps”), including:

  • Calculator
  • Calendar
  • Fax
  • Email
  • Alarm clock
  • Notepad
  • To-do list

Instead of having to walk to the fax machine to manually send a message (talk about a phrase that hasn’t been uttered in a decade), you could simply type into this tiny box and be on your way.

From this point, humans were hooked on multi-functionality. And very rapidly, we expanded upon IBM’s vision.

Realizing the Effects of Smart Devices on Mental Health

In the thirty years since Simon was released, we’ve moved light-years ahead in what smart devices can do. With smart glasses, smart rings, smart watches, and (of course) smartphones all now available, fairly affordable, and rapidly evolving, we have the chance to be connected every second of every day.

In response, many scientists and psychologists have set out to determine exactly how this instant access to everything under the sun affects our emotional, behavioral, and mental health.

The results are about what you’d expect. Studies have shown just how dependent we’ve become on our smartphones, with nearly half of the respondents of one study by the Pew Research Center saying they would be “unable to live without their phone” and that being separated from their phone results in feelings of “anxiety and withdrawal.” Dependence on smart devices is a very real phenomenon affecting today’s population, particularly younger generations, who have never known a world without this kind of technology.

With 95% of teens ages 13-17 having access to a smartphone, emerging research has found that a person’s hours of screen time per day directly correlates to adverse mental health effects. In one eleven-year survey by Gunnell and colleagues, researchers found that an increase in screen time was associated with an increase in anxiety and depression in children and young adults.

Studies have shown just how dependent we’ve become on our smartphones, with nearly half of the respondents of one study by the Pew Research Center saying they would be "unable to live without their phone." 

Additionally, one of the most-cited consequences of smart device use has been a disturbance of sleep. Many of us have heard of the idea of going “screen-less” for the last hour of our waking day.

There are several reasons for this. The blue light emitted from our phones, laptops, and tablets can throw off our body’s internal clock. At the same time, doing thought-heavy activities like playing games or thinking of a witty response to fire back to a friend can continue to stimulate the mind, rather than winding it down for sleep.

But there’s another process that many of us fall victim to every week: revenge bedtime procrastination.

Essentially, during our busy day, we feel like we can’t get a moment to ourselves. So, once we get into bed, we hop on our smart device and scroll, absorbing all the content we can. We’re determined to carve out a little personal time — even if that comes at the price of fragmented sleep.

Poor sleep from this cycle can weaken our ability to make decisions, while increasing anxiety and depression.

Our Dwindling Need to Recall Knowledge

In addition to affecting stress levels and sleep quality, some researchers suggest that our way of learning and absorbing information has changed after using these devices so regularly for so long.

Imagine that it’s thirty years ago, and your sink is leaking.

Well, in 1994, “Google” was not a verb; in fact, it wasn’t even a word. This meant that you couldn’t simply type “how to fix leak” into a search bar and be gifted with a step-by-step guide on what to do.

Instead, you’d likely go through some trial and error to see if you could figure out how to stop that leak, which would require a significant amount of brainpower and problem-solving.

Today, we don’t have to go through this thought-stimulating process. Instead, we simply type a few letters on our screen, and we’re given exact steps to accomplish what we need.

The problem? Having this constant access to technology may affect our ability to recall information we’ve previously learned. It makes sense — why should our mind spend the brainpower retaining this information when we can effortlessly look it up again if we need it?

(And smart devices' effect on our ability to focus? Our utter inability to multitask? Those are whole separate topics!)

Having this constant access to technology may affect our ability to recall information we've previously learned.

This constant access to information has also led to a decline in an essential aspect of our mental health: socialization.

Let’s say it's still 1994 and you haven’t been able to fix that annoying leak in your sink. To get some assistance, you may head down to the hardware store to ask an associate for advice. Or you might call your dad.

While these interactions may seem inconsequential, we know that these social interactions are essential to our brain health. Unfortunately, people today are experiencing fewer and fewer encounters like these due to the isolating nature of smart devices.

Breaking Our Dopamine Addiction

There's another sneaky process at work in fueling our addiction to smart devices. Constantly checking notifications, whether it be a text, comment on an Instagram post, or a reminder to play Wordle, has been found to give our brains a boost in dopamine.

Dopamine is a neurotransmitter that can help us feel pleasure. This is why seeing that someone left a comment on your Facebook post (or TikTok, depending on your generation) can leave you feeling a certain kind of high.

However, dopamine isn’t all rainbows and good feelings. When you obtain regular spikes in dopamine, your body begins to need more dopamine to continue to feel that pleasure. So, you need to check your notifications more and more often to continue to get that positive feeling.

And when that person isn’t checking their alerts — what happens?

They experience more emotional lows. These low feelings can lead to more stress and anxiety that can impact all aspects of life.

It's far past time we re-regulate how much dopamine our brains get — and hopefully, move into a healthier, more natural cycle.

It's far past time we re-regulate how much dopamine our brains get — and hopefully, move into a healthier, more natural cycle.

The Difference of a Single-Purpose Device

With all this emerging research on the effects of smart devices, the idea of moving back toward simplicity and “doing one thing well” has become a major discussion in the tech world in recent years.

A single-purpose device is exactly what it sounds like: a device that has one function and one function only. For example, a fridge that merely keeps your food cold rather than reading you the weather report.

As these sole-use products continue to rise in popularity, we’ll no doubt see more studies comparing the mental health implications of using a single-feature product versus a smart device. But we can already draw some conclusions from smart device-focused research.

It’s been found that, on average, people check their email between 11 and 36 times per hour. This can mean that during the work day, a person is checking their email, Slack, or another communication app every six minutes.

Six minutes!

How can you get a workflow going if you’re interrupting yourself ten times an hour? Already we can see the benefits of stripping away distractions to focus on mentally taxing tasks like reading and writing.

Of course, many people still have plenty of non-technological single-purpose items we use daily: a coffee maker that strictly brews coffee; a dresser that holds your clothes; a mechanical watch that does not keep track of your step count. Rather than that jolting nuclear-alarm-meltdown sound that is the default on the iPhone, many people elect to set a physical alarm clock to wake them up.

These items do one purpose well, and that’s all we need (and expect) from them. In some ways, it’s reassuring to experience that focus. It’s also better for your brain.

However, it’s important to point out that single-purpose devices don't necessarily need to be non-technical. There are exceptionally fancy alarm clocks available today, from ones that roll around the floor to others that mimic the rising sun. Yet, most of these are not also allowing you to check your emails first thing in the morning.

And that's a good thing.

Teams like those here at Freewrite and over at brands like Light Phone and Brick are developing great single-purpose tech to help you do more of what you love without sacrificing your mental health.

Storytellers who do their best work when disconnected from their Slack pings often opt to use a dedicated drafting device from our lineup. Just like a Kindle offers distraction-free reading, Freewrite enables a writer to write distraction-free to their heart’s content.

This has led to the Freewrite community reporting that they average writing two to three times more words per hour on a single-purpose Freewrite device.

In other words: We can embrace new technology while also interrogating its effect on human beings and modern life.

Both are possible. I promise. 

We can embrace new technology while also interrogating its effect on human beings and modern life.

Integrating the Single-Purpose Philosophy into Your Life

From higher productivity to less stress and better sleep, the data is pretty clear that we’d all benefit from less time on our smart devices.

We encourage you to explore the work being done at likeminded tech companies to see if you and your health could benefit from single-purpose technology. There are analogue changes you can make, too.

For example, you can use your bed for sleeping only. When you wake up, no scrolling through social media. Before bed, don’t cozy up to watch the newest episode of Bridgerton. No more enjoying a snack under your covers.

Your bed becomes designated for sleep and sleep alone. (Yes, sleep experts recommend this!)

If you have a single-purpose tool you love, we want to hear from you! Share it on social media and tag us @getfreewrite.

STRUGGLE WITH DIGITAL OVERLOAD? YOU'RE NOT ALONE. READ ACCOUNTS FROM FELLOW FREEWRITERS ABOUT THEIR STRUGGLE TO USE TECH IN A HEALTHY WAY.

Recommended articles

More recommended articles for you

September 05, 2024 7 min read

Everyone has a pandemic story because it's hard to forget. I remember the quickness of it all — societal norms flipping, turning, and somersaulting, which still makes my head spin. "Stuff is gonna get weird," I remember telling my friend. "Especially art."

August 29, 2024 4 min read

Right now, the choice for a writer to use artificial intelligence (AI) or not has been largely a personal one. Some view it as a killer of creativity, while others see it as an endless well of inspiration.

But what if, in the future, your choice had larger implications on the state of literature as a whole?

This is the question that’s being raised from a new study by the University of Exeter Business School: If you could use AI to improve your own writing, at the expense of the overall literary experience, would you?

Let’s explore some context before you answer.

The Set Up

The 2024 study recruited 293 writers to write an eight-sentence “micro” story. The participants were split into three groups:

  • Writing by human brainpower only
  • The opportunity to get one AI-generated idea to inspire their writing
  • The opportunity to get up to five AI-generated ideas to inspire their writing

Then, 600 evaluators judged how creative these short stories were. The results confirmed a widely accepted idea but also offered a few surprising findings.

Prompts from AI Can Jumpstart the Creative Process

Right off the bat, the reviewers rated the AI-guided stories as being more original, better written, and more enjoyable to read. (Interesting to note that they did not find them funnier than the fully human-inspired stories.)

This actually isn’t that surprising. Most writers know the “blank page dread” at the beginning of a project. Even as I write this, I can’t help but wonder, “If I had been tasked with writing an eight-sentence story, what the heck would I have written about?”

Many writers share this sense of needing to pick the “right” story to tell. And that uniquely human concept of perfectionism can end up actually inhibiting our creative process.

A prompt, then, can help us quickly clear this mental hurdle. To test this, I’ll give you one, courtesy of ChatGPT: “Write a story about a teenager who discovers a mysterious journal that reveals hidden secrets about their town, leading them on an unexpected adventure to uncover the truth.”

Can you feel your creative juices flowing already?

Since its release, AI has been celebrated for its ability to assist in idea generation; and this study confirms how effective using artificial intelligence in this way can be for writers — some, it seems, more than others.

AI-Generated Ideas Helped Less Creative Writers More

It doesn’t feel great to judge a writer’s creative prowess, but for this study, researchers needed to do just that. Prior to writing their short stories, the writers took a test to measure their creativity.

Researchers found that those considered less creative did substantially better when given AI-generated ideas — to the point where getting the full five ideas from AI “effectively equalizes the creativity scores across less and more creative writers.”

This isn’t the case just for writing. Another study by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship WZ also found that AI tools most benefit employees with weaker skills.

So is AI leveling the playing field between okay and great writers? It seems it may be. But before we lament, there’s one more finding that proves using AI isn’t all perks.

AI-Aided Stories Were More Similar — And Needed to Be Credited

The researchers took a step back to look at all the AI-supported stories collectively. And what did they find?

The AI-assisted stories were more similar as a whole, compared to the fully human-written stories.

Additionally, when reviewers were told that a story was enhanced by an AI idea, they “imposed an ownership penalty of at least 25%,” even indicating that “the content creators, on which the models were based, should be compensated.”

This leads us to that all-important question about AI-assisted work: who owns the content?

According to Originality.AI, an AI and plagiarism detector, “When there’s a combination of AI and human-generated elements, the human elements may receive copyright protection if they meet the requirements.”

So right now, if a writer uses AI to generate ideas — but writes the content themselves — they retain rights to the work.

However, Originality.AI even admits that “the legal system is having a hard time keeping up” with the rapid adoption of artificial intelligence. Time will only tell what AI regulations will look like in a few years.

What Does an AI-Assisted Literary Future Look Like?

The researchers from the University of Exeter Business School study raise an interesting point about what the future landscape for writers may look like. If droves of authors begin using AI to come up with ideas, we may end up with a lot of well-written yet dime-a-dozen stories.

So will human beings choose the easier, but less diverse, path? Or will we stick to fighting through writer’s block armed with nothing but our own brain?

Or, a third option: can we somehow learn to harness AI to supercharge our writing process without sacrificing the wholly unique creativity that infuses human creation?

That’s one question that even ChatGPT can’t answer.

Editor's Note: Artificial intelligence may have already transformed writing, but that doesn't mean you shouldn't be in control of your own words. Read Astrohaus Founder Adam Leeb's statement on AI and privacy.

August 22, 2024 8 min read

While AI has capabilities that range from coding to image generation, the model that excites — and terrifies — writers is the LLM. It won’t be long before we see the world’s first blockbuster novel, written entirely by an LLM. What does this mean for art, and writers in particular? Is it all doom and gloom? The answer is, of course, more complicated than yes or no.