Starting to Read Hemingway - Reviewing For Whom the Bell Tolls

June 29, 2021 | 3 min read

Operations Manager Sam writes about diving into the Hemingway canon as Team Freewrite prepares to launch Hemingwrite, the signature edition Freewrite.

Conversations to bring back the Hemingwrite started at least two years ago. Others on the team were making design suggestions based on some of Hemingway's signature claims to fame - from big game hunting to Parisian escapades and tropical fishing. I nodded along but I quickly realized that I knew nothing about this man. I'm not well read nor very interested in the macho, cigar-and-scotch stereotype that I associated with Hemingway. More Frank Ocean than Old Man and the Sea, if you will.

Anyways, I felt like a phony making contributions to a product called the "Hemingwrite" without doing some due diligence on the namesake. So I cracked open For Whom the Bells Tolls to see what the fuss was all about. I imagine there are others of you out there like me who have heard of Hemingway but are otherwise unfamiliar. This book review is for you.

"I cracked open For Whom the Bells Tolls to see what the fuss was all about."

Before I even opened the book, I did a little research. Much of this Nicole covered in other blogs, but the basic idea that I got from Hemingway's writing is that he led the movement away from flowery descriptive prose to concise narrative. He tells the story and gets the heck out of the way. According to Hemingway, he writes out just the tip of the iceberg with the rest of the meaning, emotion, and imagery submerged between the lines.

I think this holds true for For Whom the Bell Tolls. In this story, our hero, Robert Jordan, is an American volunteer for the Republicans in the Spanish civil war. He is apparently very good at blowing up bridges and is assigned to do just that. Along the way he encounters a ragtag brigade of characters also fighting to keep Spain from succumbing to the fascists. Think Ocean's 11, except instead of stealing from Casinos it's blowing up a bridge.

Among this bunch is Pilar, the matriarch and de facto leader; Pablo, the de juro leader succumbing to his PTSD-fueled demons; and Maria, Robert Jordan’s mid-war fling. Other characters include Anselmo, Rafael, Fernando, Joaquin, El Sordo, Augustin, and a few others. I mention these characters because Hemingway treats them with great care. He takes the extra time to color them in through delightful conversations, campfire stories, and few action scenes. We all experience the same things in different ways and Hemingway makes sure to highlight that through his characters.

"Think Ocean's 11, except instead of stealing from Casinos it's blowing up a bridge."

The rest of the book is mostly Robert Jordan pondering. Don't get me wrong, I love a good ponder myself. I'm sure if I were in Robert Jordan's shoes I'd be asking the same questions—is war bad? What is love? What does my future hold? And so on. It gets indulgent at times, and clearly Hemingway sees himself as Robert Jordan. However, RJ is a worthy protagonist.

FWTBT is a story of war—or rather the people that fight and die in them. I think in this book, Hemingway gives away a bit more of the iceberg than he does in, say, the Old Man and the Sea. However, I think our posse of messy main characters serve as an excellent vessel for both a cool story about blowing up a bridge and a commentary on the world.

"Hemingway gives away a bit more of the iceberg than he does in, say, the Old Man and the Sea."

As for Ernest, I still don't know what to think. He is everything that people say he is, but he is other stuff too. Or maybe he is whoever you want him to be. Looking for a book to help you grow some chest hair? There's plenty of guns, sex, and booze for you. Looking for romance in the heat of battle? I got a book for you. Entertaining historical fiction? Yep. Comedy? That too.

I'm happy I read some Hemingway. I'd recommend it. Maybe you'd even get inspired to write like him, too. In that case, I've got a great product for you.

 

hemingwrite waitlist

 

Recommended articles

More recommended articles for you

September 05, 2024 7 min read

Everyone has a pandemic story because it's hard to forget. I remember the quickness of it all — societal norms flipping, turning, and somersaulting, which still makes my head spin. "Stuff is gonna get weird," I remember telling my friend. "Especially art."

August 29, 2024 4 min read

Right now, the choice for a writer to use artificial intelligence (AI) or not has been largely a personal one. Some view it as a killer of creativity, while others see it as an endless well of inspiration.

But what if, in the future, your choice had larger implications on the state of literature as a whole?

This is the question that’s being raised from a new study by the University of Exeter Business School: If you could use AI to improve your own writing, at the expense of the overall literary experience, would you?

Let’s explore some context before you answer.

The Set Up

The 2024 study recruited 293 writers to write an eight-sentence “micro” story. The participants were split into three groups:

  • Writing by human brainpower only
  • The opportunity to get one AI-generated idea to inspire their writing
  • The opportunity to get up to five AI-generated ideas to inspire their writing

Then, 600 evaluators judged how creative these short stories were. The results confirmed a widely accepted idea but also offered a few surprising findings.

Prompts from AI Can Jumpstart the Creative Process

Right off the bat, the reviewers rated the AI-guided stories as being more original, better written, and more enjoyable to read. (Interesting to note that they did not find them funnier than the fully human-inspired stories.)

This actually isn’t that surprising. Most writers know the “blank page dread” at the beginning of a project. Even as I write this, I can’t help but wonder, “If I had been tasked with writing an eight-sentence story, what the heck would I have written about?”

Many writers share this sense of needing to pick the “right” story to tell. And that uniquely human concept of perfectionism can end up actually inhibiting our creative process.

A prompt, then, can help us quickly clear this mental hurdle. To test this, I’ll give you one, courtesy of ChatGPT: “Write a story about a teenager who discovers a mysterious journal that reveals hidden secrets about their town, leading them on an unexpected adventure to uncover the truth.”

Can you feel your creative juices flowing already?

Since its release, AI has been celebrated for its ability to assist in idea generation; and this study confirms how effective using artificial intelligence in this way can be for writers — some, it seems, more than others.

AI-Generated Ideas Helped Less Creative Writers More

It doesn’t feel great to judge a writer’s creative prowess, but for this study, researchers needed to do just that. Prior to writing their short stories, the writers took a test to measure their creativity.

Researchers found that those considered less creative did substantially better when given AI-generated ideas — to the point where getting the full five ideas from AI “effectively equalizes the creativity scores across less and more creative writers.”

This isn’t the case just for writing. Another study by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship WZ also found that AI tools most benefit employees with weaker skills.

So is AI leveling the playing field between okay and great writers? It seems it may be. But before we lament, there’s one more finding that proves using AI isn’t all perks.

AI-Aided Stories Were More Similar — And Needed to Be Credited

The researchers took a step back to look at all the AI-supported stories collectively. And what did they find?

The AI-assisted stories were more similar as a whole, compared to the fully human-written stories.

Additionally, when reviewers were told that a story was enhanced by an AI idea, they “imposed an ownership penalty of at least 25%,” even indicating that “the content creators, on which the models were based, should be compensated.”

This leads us to that all-important question about AI-assisted work: who owns the content?

According to Originality.AI, an AI and plagiarism detector, “When there’s a combination of AI and human-generated elements, the human elements may receive copyright protection if they meet the requirements.”

So right now, if a writer uses AI to generate ideas — but writes the content themselves — they retain rights to the work.

However, Originality.AI even admits that “the legal system is having a hard time keeping up” with the rapid adoption of artificial intelligence. Time will only tell what AI regulations will look like in a few years.

What Does an AI-Assisted Literary Future Look Like?

The researchers from the University of Exeter Business School study raise an interesting point about what the future landscape for writers may look like. If droves of authors begin using AI to come up with ideas, we may end up with a lot of well-written yet dime-a-dozen stories.

So will human beings choose the easier, but less diverse, path? Or will we stick to fighting through writer’s block armed with nothing but our own brain?

Or, a third option: can we somehow learn to harness AI to supercharge our writing process without sacrificing the wholly unique creativity that infuses human creation?

That’s one question that even ChatGPT can’t answer.

Editor's Note: Artificial intelligence may have already transformed writing, but that doesn't mean you shouldn't be in control of your own words. Read Astrohaus Founder Adam Leeb's statement on AI and privacy.

August 22, 2024 8 min read

While AI has capabilities that range from coding to image generation, the model that excites — and terrifies — writers is the LLM. It won’t be long before we see the world’s first blockbuster novel, written entirely by an LLM. What does this mean for art, and writers in particular? Is it all doom and gloom? The answer is, of course, more complicated than yes or no.