Perfectionism Is Making You Worse at Art

Michael Archambault
July 26, 2024 | 3 min read

"Perfectionism is the voice of the oppressor, the enemy of the people. It will keep you cramped and insane your whole life, and it is the main obstacle between you and a shitty first draft."

Anne Lamott

First drafts will never be perfect; this is not a remark to demoralize writers but a sincere reminder of actuality.

Writers and editors have typed, erased, rewritten, and edited the article you are reading. We have transformed the first unkempt draft into a more refined set of ideas.

That's a critical part of the writing process. So focusing on getting it perfect the first time? That's not only impossible — it's going to hinder your progress.

Let's explore the concept of perfectionism — only accepting something free of all flaws — and learn how overcoming that view of your work could be the most significant step you take on your writing journey.

Overcoming a Fear of Failure

Many writers strive for perfection. We repeatedly set unrealistically high bars that set us up for future failure. Ironically, we strive for perfection because of our internal fear of failure.

Ensuring that every word we put on the page is perfect, we reason, will decrease our chances of being judged or criticized.

But that's just not reality.

The competitive progress-based society we live in doesn't help either. In a world where success and high achievement are valued, presenting a work less than perfect feels akin to defeat. Just turn on the news, browse social media, or chat with colleagues to quickly see how we relentlessly showcase (seemingly) flawless success. (Spoiler alert: That's not real, either.)

The biggest problem is that perfectionism is like a drug for those who find joy in external validation. We set the power of validation in individuals around us rather than ourselves. Of course, this is harmful, as it's impossible for any large mass of people to unanimously view an author or story as perfect.

The danger in this search for perfection is that it interrupts our creative process, and we never finish — or start! — a project at all.

Even Stephen King, who has published over sixty novels, ten short story collections, and five non-fiction works, continues to receive his share of ridicule. How does he break through the fear of failure to create anyway?

"You can't please all the readers all the time; you can't even please some of the readers all the time, but you should at least try to please yourself."

Stephen King

Attacking Perfectionism Head-On

As in many mental battles, the most important — and challenging — move is simply to let go. Transform the idea of perfectionism into improvement.

By focusing on perfectionism, we create a mental space where we over-process and find ourselves in worlds of indecision — we block out the sun and cease to grow, diminishing our potential.

Prevent this by embracing a growth mindset. Start by setting achievable goals and realistic deadlines for your writing. Focus on just drafting, not editing as you go.

We recommend learning how to freewrite. Peter Elbow, an English professor focusing on writing theory and practice, popularized writer Ken Macrorie's initial notion — don't worry about perfectionism; just get words on the page.

To do this, a writer shuts off the critical part of their brain (aka the inner critic) and focuses on exploring inner creativity. When freewriting, the writer doesn't stop to research or go back and edit — they just write.

Write first and come back later to edit; the key to overcoming perfection is to create a distinction between these two different steps of the writing process.

Write first and come back later to edit; the key to overcoming perfection is to create a distinction between these two different steps of the writing process.

Your Journey with Freewriting

If you're having trouble separating the writing process from the editing process, you may benefit from a purpose-designed tool like the Freewrite Smart Typewriter.

We also recommend starting with our FREE ultimate guide to freewriting!

Recommended articles

More recommended articles for you

September 05, 2024 7 min read

Everyone has a pandemic story because it's hard to forget. I remember the quickness of it all — societal norms flipping, turning, and somersaulting, which still makes my head spin. "Stuff is gonna get weird," I remember telling my friend. "Especially art."

August 29, 2024 4 min read

Right now, the choice for a writer to use artificial intelligence (AI) or not has been largely a personal one. Some view it as a killer of creativity, while others see it as an endless well of inspiration.

But what if, in the future, your choice had larger implications on the state of literature as a whole?

This is the question that’s being raised from a new study by the University of Exeter Business School: If you could use AI to improve your own writing, at the expense of the overall literary experience, would you?

Let’s explore some context before you answer.

The Set Up

The 2024 study recruited 293 writers to write an eight-sentence “micro” story. The participants were split into three groups:

  • Writing by human brainpower only
  • The opportunity to get one AI-generated idea to inspire their writing
  • The opportunity to get up to five AI-generated ideas to inspire their writing

Then, 600 evaluators judged how creative these short stories were. The results confirmed a widely accepted idea but also offered a few surprising findings.

Prompts from AI Can Jumpstart the Creative Process

Right off the bat, the reviewers rated the AI-guided stories as being more original, better written, and more enjoyable to read. (Interesting to note that they did not find them funnier than the fully human-inspired stories.)

This actually isn’t that surprising. Most writers know the “blank page dread” at the beginning of a project. Even as I write this, I can’t help but wonder, “If I had been tasked with writing an eight-sentence story, what the heck would I have written about?”

Many writers share this sense of needing to pick the “right” story to tell. And that uniquely human concept of perfectionism can end up actually inhibiting our creative process.

A prompt, then, can help us quickly clear this mental hurdle. To test this, I’ll give you one, courtesy of ChatGPT: “Write a story about a teenager who discovers a mysterious journal that reveals hidden secrets about their town, leading them on an unexpected adventure to uncover the truth.”

Can you feel your creative juices flowing already?

Since its release, AI has been celebrated for its ability to assist in idea generation; and this study confirms how effective using artificial intelligence in this way can be for writers — some, it seems, more than others.

AI-Generated Ideas Helped Less Creative Writers More

It doesn’t feel great to judge a writer’s creative prowess, but for this study, researchers needed to do just that. Prior to writing their short stories, the writers took a test to measure their creativity.

Researchers found that those considered less creative did substantially better when given AI-generated ideas — to the point where getting the full five ideas from AI “effectively equalizes the creativity scores across less and more creative writers.”

This isn’t the case just for writing. Another study by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship WZ also found that AI tools most benefit employees with weaker skills.

So is AI leveling the playing field between okay and great writers? It seems it may be. But before we lament, there’s one more finding that proves using AI isn’t all perks.

AI-Aided Stories Were More Similar — And Needed to Be Credited

The researchers took a step back to look at all the AI-supported stories collectively. And what did they find?

The AI-assisted stories were more similar as a whole, compared to the fully human-written stories.

Additionally, when reviewers were told that a story was enhanced by an AI idea, they “imposed an ownership penalty of at least 25%,” even indicating that “the content creators, on which the models were based, should be compensated.”

This leads us to that all-important question about AI-assisted work: who owns the content?

According to Originality.AI, an AI and plagiarism detector, “When there’s a combination of AI and human-generated elements, the human elements may receive copyright protection if they meet the requirements.”

So right now, if a writer uses AI to generate ideas — but writes the content themselves — they retain rights to the work.

However, Originality.AI even admits that “the legal system is having a hard time keeping up” with the rapid adoption of artificial intelligence. Time will only tell what AI regulations will look like in a few years.

What Does an AI-Assisted Literary Future Look Like?

The researchers from the University of Exeter Business School study raise an interesting point about what the future landscape for writers may look like. If droves of authors begin using AI to come up with ideas, we may end up with a lot of well-written yet dime-a-dozen stories.

So will human beings choose the easier, but less diverse, path? Or will we stick to fighting through writer’s block armed with nothing but our own brain?

Or, a third option: can we somehow learn to harness AI to supercharge our writing process without sacrificing the wholly unique creativity that infuses human creation?

That’s one question that even ChatGPT can’t answer.

Editor's Note: Artificial intelligence may have already transformed writing, but that doesn't mean you shouldn't be in control of your own words. Read Astrohaus Founder Adam Leeb's statement on AI and privacy.

August 22, 2024 8 min read

While AI has capabilities that range from coding to image generation, the model that excites — and terrifies — writers is the LLM. It won’t be long before we see the world’s first blockbuster novel, written entirely by an LLM. What does this mean for art, and writers in particular? Is it all doom and gloom? The answer is, of course, more complicated than yes or no.